SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: briskit who wrote (16342)2/19/2004 8:31:34 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Remembering back to -->"The Last Temptation of Christ"...and its film debut 30yrs later, which every Christian should have wept tears at its awesome marvelous beauty and portrayal
pbs.org

..and so few "Christians" could see the beauty because of their usual response of blind rage and pious indoctrinated indignations ...which as usual seems so christian of them.

"When Nikos Kazantzakis publishes The Last Temptation of Christ in 1955, the Catholic Church bans it and the Greek Orthodox Church excommunicates him.

Three decades later, acclaimed director Martin Scorsese releases his screen adaptation of the novel. The film, according to its prologue, "is not based on the Gospels, but upon this fictional exploration of the eternal spiritual conflict." Scorsese, known for such masterpieces as Raging Bull and Taxi Driver, portrays Jesus as a confused man who struggles against his dual nature, in thoughts more than action.

<font size=4>Before The Last Temptation of Christ is completed, Christian groups worldwide condemn it as blasphemous,<font size=5> although Christian theology teaches that Jesus is both fully human and fully divine, and that to say otherwise is heresy. <font size=3>

Preproduction begins at Universal Studios in 1983, and until the film's release in 1988, groups affiliated with the Christian right demonstrate against The Last Temptation of Christ through petitions, phone campaigns, radio broadcasts, and street protests.

Aware of mounting organized pressure against the film, in 1987, Universal hires a liaison with the Christian community, a born-again Christian himself, and arranges a private advance screening for agitated groups, including Reverend Donald Wildmon's American Family Association and Bill Bright's Campus Crusade for Christ. The audience is especially disgusted by a closing image: Christ on the cross is tempted by Satan with visions of a "normal" life with the prostitute Mary Magdalene, replete with sex, marriage, and children. Some 1,200 Christian radio stations in California denounce the film, and Mastermedia International urges a boycott against parent company MCA. Bill Bright offers to reimburse Universal for its investment in The Last Temptation of Christ in exchange for all existing prints, which he vows to destroy.

Universal responds with an open letter in newspapers across the country, saying that acquiescence to these forces would infringe on the First Amendment rights of all Americans. On the day the letter appears, more than 600 protesters, sponsored by a Christian radio station in Los Angeles, picket MCA headquarters.

The protests are effective. Edwards Theaters, with 150 theaters nationwide, refuses to screen the film, as do United Artists and General Cinemas, with 3,500 theaters between them. In August 1988, Universal opens The Last Temptation of Christ in nine major cities in the United States and Canada. The day before its premiere, Citizens for a Universal Appeal, a coalition of religious groups from Orange County, CA, stages a protest in front of Universal's L.A. headquarters that attracts some 25,000 participants.

By the time The Last Temptation of Christ goes into wide release in September, the national controversy has waned, but now individual cities and towns seek bans. Among them, Savannah, GA, New Orleans, Oklahoma City, and Santa Ana, CA, succeed.

In 1989, Blockbuster Video declines to carry the film in its stores. The policy remains, though it is available for purchase on the chain's Web site. In the mid-90s, The Last Temptation of Christ reignites protests in Canada and Russia when it airs on national television.

Although critics give the movie mixed reviews on aesthetic grounds, the film earns Martin Scorsese an Academy Award nomination for Best Director. And in 1997, the American Film Institute bestows upon him the Life Achievement Award, considered the highest career honor in Hollywood.



*** how dare Nikos Kazantkis portray Jesus as a man with many of the same confusions and temptations as any other ...yet suffered beautifully and sacrificed so much for his "art" of salvation and fight for the freedom of the people . It seems the confusion was and is still all there's , when they cannot even begin to accept their own flawed emotions and duality of dogma regarding their "Savior".

Christianity suffered from the start of a middleclass fashionable view of salvation , as if this new messiah was only the newest fashion to come along back then grasped onto from a threatened and splintered crumbling empire. Jesus got whitewashed that is for sure.



To: briskit who wrote (16342)2/19/2004 8:48:42 PM
From: 2MAR$  Respond to of 28931
 
Since the slave period, blacks have understood and portrayed Jesus as a Suffering Savior and a grassroots leader who was the victim of state-sponsored terror. Black theology has focused on the humanity and socially marginal status of Jesus. More than that, blacks have been attracted to the Jesus who experienced unjust victimization by the authorities and the community, but found empowering comfort in the conviction that a just God would someday even the score. This spirituality and faith generated Negro Spirituals, gospel music, prayers, sermons, and religious art that embraced the graphic reality of political death and dying.

In his book, Jesus and the Disinherited, Christian mystic and black theologian Howard Thurman said that whenever we sanitize the grotesque image of the suffering servant, we again inflict violence upon his identity and mission. He endured each moment of that suffering, we dare not minimize it to suit our sensibilities. Not surprisingly, Dr. King always carried that book in his briefcase.


I would say that is a very powerful statement...if as they say in the common tongue,<font size=4>

"let's get real !"


( and reason together )

<G>



To: briskit who wrote (16342)2/19/2004 9:05:28 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
The theology that underwrites this sanitized Jesus avoids the brutal manifestations of oppression and violence he experienced. Even when crucifixion scenes appear in Anglo-American religious art, you may see a little blood and a wound or two, but almost never the dirty and broken body that endured torture for several hours. This film's lingering gaze upon the grotesque will be difficult for viewers accustomed to such art.

That was exactly what occurred 1700 yrs ago in Rome , when this latest updated version of the God-man swept up Rome , not from some pious and humble idea of salvation , but as the latest craze and fashion , for a dying slave state and crumbling empire threatened by barbarians and about to lose all its comfort and security trying to save itself. The Romans were absolutely dillitante in their appreciation of true mysticism or the message of asceticism , but hungered after every new strange and wonderful form of mystery rite that came along. Saul's "Jesus" fit the bill for them, and the promise of salvation and eternal life.

To think that a man would go humbly to his death for defending the poor masses , the sick and the slaves was quite a novle idea , and would have been repugnant to the earlier roman and met with only derision. But later on when all seemed lost , of course they would turn to some messiah/man-god , that held the promise of ever lasting life .

They were so incredibly inept at really getting the "real" point of metaphysics or essential gist of the psyche of religion , being mainly beaurocrats and politicians surrounded by the militarism..so it has never surprised me how the game continued to play out in the following centuries thru the crusades and peddled itself on down to the fundamentalist right wing whackos of today, that show so very little love for anything , but their own contemptuous outrage and indignations.

All one has to do , is consider the "pious source" of the conspiculously middle class crumbling empire that adopted it, and the terror campaigns of persecutions they went on to wage . Still the image of such a man was a pardyne shift and evolution for them of sorts for sure. ( I want my library of Alexandria back !)

(but not Jesus the man..if he did really teach ,wander around with disciples , walk on water &
live and die crucified as described)



To: briskit who wrote (16342)2/19/2004 9:17:52 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Black viewers may also find themselves revisiting painful memories of young men from our communities who were hanged from trees with drenched, bloodstained clothes as the local townspeople looked on with satisfaction. Billie Holiday captured the horror of these scenes in her heartbreaking song singing, "southern trees bear strange fruit."

Here's the song's lyrics performed by Billy Holiday, from Rome to Mississippi ...slavery inspite of jesus<g>
ladyday.net

STRANGE FRUIT
Lewis Allen

Southern trees bear strange fruit,
Blood on the leaves and blood at the root,
Black bodies swinging in the southern breeze,
Strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees.

Pastoral scene of the gallant south,
The bulging eyes and the twisted mouth,
Scent of magnolias, sweet and fresh,
Then the sudden smell of burning flesh.

Here is fruit for the crows to pluck,
For the rain to gather, for the wind to suck,
For the sun to rot, for the trees to drop,
Here is a strange and bitter crop.