Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (30571)	2/20/2004 10:52:04 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793866

Sullivan "loses it" on the Gay issue. My impression is that his commentary on the subject has been quite responsible and restrained considering his profound interest in the matter. <<But Wednesday's editorial on the San Francisco marriage applauded the mayor's action in San Francisco>> After I replied to your post of the article, it bothered me that the Times would condone the mayor's actions so I went back and found the editorial, itself. Turns out that it did no such thing.

To: LindyBill who wrote (30571)	2/20/2004 12:00:07 PM
From: John Carragher	Respond to of 793866

local radio quoting some statistics on jobs. 25% of all jobs are brand new type jobs that never existed before 1970. (then he says take that John Kerry on losing jobs) I take away that working people need to continue to educate themselves to stay on top of current job requirements. Those surplused do need retraining but those jobs may be in a different area of the country, so relocation may be necessary. Perhaps a some of the unemployed are unwilling to learn a new type job, relocate and are permanately on the roll call of unemployed looking for work.