SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (30594)2/20/2004 2:51:42 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
Do you mean that you think it should be worded so as to allow states to enact gay marriages if they choose, but not force other states to recognize them?



To: Lane3 who wrote (30594)2/21/2004 2:19:30 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 

If they did initiate a Constitutional amendment, it makes sense to me to address it as an exception to full faith and credit rather than imposing anything from on high.

I thought that was already covered by the Defense of Marriage Act.

Derek


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News