Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (543241)	2/20/2004 2:11:15 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 769667

That is a very good idea. I agree.

To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (543241)	2/20/2004 2:12:46 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

What if a group of homosexuals form a church that follows, say, a Christian doctrine with the exception of performing gay marriages? Would the state recognize such a marriage? Separate but equal rarely is... Btw: this article points out the legal stickiness of preventing gay marriage but recognizing civil unions. Apparently, it just makes the law a mess; you would have to make marriage and civil unions legally equivalent, but then how do you make them legally separate? writ.news.findlaw.com