SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : John EDWARDS for President -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (350)2/21/2004 1:12:46 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1381
 
Ann,

Re: War is definitely hell...but the U.S. GI's are the best trained military in the History of the world. Remember the Romans?...now that's brutality.

You sound like an automaton. "War is hell, yah, so what?"

Being the best trained means that the U.S. forces are the most efficient, yah? The most efficient military forces are the most brutal, yah?

What part of "the U.S. military being incredibly more devastating to human beings than the Roman armies" don't you understand?

***
Re: What would you suggest? The military should deal with a Saddam Hussein who invades a neighboring country, so we politely ask...."would you puleeeeeze go back home, Mr. Hussein?"

First and foremost, I'd suggest you get an education. I'm shocked at how little you comprehend about U.S. foreign policy and the nature of realpolitik

For instance, have you read "Second Front" by Rick MacArthur, the publisher of Harper's Monthly? Apparently not, else you wouldn't make your extraordinarily childish comments about Gulf War I. You are a fool not to understand that the U.S. built up Saddam Hussein's military capabilities in the 1980s and then when he asked permission to attack Kuwait for stealing Iraq's oil and devastating the Iraq economy by using the stolen oil to destroy the pricing for crude oil, he got permission from April Glaspie, Margaret Tutwiler and the State Department. You are a fool. You don't understand that Saddam was betrayed by the Bush family. Do you?

Do you?

Do you understand anything?

Or are you just a childish fool?

Have you got one iota of a clue as to what game is afoot and how it is being played? Nothing that you've written so far indicates that you have a clue as to how devious and despicable American foreign policy really is. Sorry. You seem like part of the clueless club. But don't feel alone. There are millions like you.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (350)2/21/2004 5:01:27 PM
From: BubbaFred  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1381
 
Death and Killing is being outsourced. Call it international coalition. All the flowery words of liberty and freedom are no longer worth to fight for. Use an international coalition of mercenaries is the vogue.

Yep, America has become the merchant of death and destruction, and the biggest supporter of one big RACIST tribe, the chosen one called zionists. YIKES!!! Let's not remain delusional on the overall scheme of things. OOOPS!, maybe you're one of them, not of the gentiles?

<<Peaceful disposition of that good ole boy, US trained and raised, and favorite status Saddam was never the intent. Destruction and chaotic Iraq was and is the best suited condition for the chosen tribe to take advantage of.>>
Message 19833199
Message 19833146

"Palestinians should not have equal rights with Jews, and why expelling them and killing them is not morally wrong, for they are "barbarians"."

Message 19832544
crystalinks.com

Outsourcing Death
2.18.2004 Travis Daub
We’re paying foreigners to die in Iraq, so we don’t have to.

The U.S. is hunting mercenaries -- so we can put them to work. Some of the most dangerous jobs in Iraq, formerly carried out by American and British service people, have been handed over to soldiers of fortune.

The continuing strain on coalition forces in Iraq, coupled with a desire to shift casualties from the "U.S. service people" column to the "We don't legally have to report some foreign guy getting blown up by a bomb" category, has led to a massive shifting of duties. Mercenaries, some provided by private military companies, some hired independently, are now guarding U.S. bases, manning checkpoints, providing security to travelers and driving unarmored trucks loaded with fuel, food, weapons, and other supplies.

The use of commercial forces to bolster U.S. military action is nothing new. Increasingly over the last ten years, the U.S. has relied on private military companies to provide additional personnel when the Pentagon finds itself short. Hiring help is cheaper than maintaining a standing army -- even if it will cost the defense department an estimated $30 billion this year alone. In practice, however, the ethical ramifications of paying for war sometimes outweigh the economic benefits. Private soldiers aren't held to as many regulations, and their actions rarely end up in Defense department reports open to the prying eyes of FOIA. In Bosnia, for instance, the U.N. discovered that the private military personnel provided by a company called DynCorp, were buying and selling prostitutes on the side. One of their victims was a 12-year-old girl.

The U.S. Department of State provides a short list of security companies operating in Iraq, just a small sample of the hundreds known to be carrying out operations. Most of these organizations, self-defined as "risk management agencies" are based in the U.S. or in the U.K., but some hail from India, Kuwait, and South Africa.

India, which is not officially involved in the "Coalition of the Willing" is now trying to determine whether or not the U.S. violated international law when it attempted to recruit 500 Indian mercenaries in early January. South Africans, also not members of the coalition, have been surprised in recent months to learn that as many as 1,500 of their countrymen are fighting in Iraq. In fact, by some estimates, private soldiers outnumber British troops, making up the second largest fighting force behind the U.S.

As dangerous as private military companies can be, the story here isn't the fact the U.S. is hiring commercial soldiers to fight in Iraq, but WHY the U.S. is hiring commercial soldiers to fight in the place of our volunteer military. Sure, personnel is stretched thin, especially at a time when forces are undergoing the biggest "turnover" (Soldiers at the end of their tours are coming home, new troops are heading out) since World War II. But that has little to do with this equation. So why hire help? The Bush Administration doesn't want dead U.S. soldiers in the press.

Take this into consideration. According to the Washington Post Planeloads of injured soldiers return to the U.S. via Andrews Air Force Base nearly every day. Hundreds of soldiers have been killed in Iraq, and their bodies are all handled by the Pentagon's morgue in at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware-in fact, morticians are said to be in high demand by the National Guard across the country. How often do you hear about these stories? Almost never. The military has blocked press access to these locations because dead soldiers don't help election-year politics. Analysts, like Duke University Political Science professor Peter D. Feaver, predict that the death toll could eventually reach a tipping point. Public sentiments will turn against the war, and the current administration. More dead U.S. service people push us closer to the tipping point. No news about casualties in Iraq is good news.

Still, the Pentagon is beholden to the families of the dead and injured. Casualties must be reported, even if there is debate over the circumstances of a death or injury. So take the soldier out of the equation. Replace him with an Indian willing to risk his life for $20,000 per year. When the Indian dies, no voter in the United States will ever know.

We outsource our call centers, our computer programming, our manufacturing and even our medicine. Our lowest wage jobs are scraped up by immigrants and foreigners, willing to do what Americans are not. Outsourcing, blamed for stealing away millions of U.S. jobs, will be one of the hot-button topics in the Presidential election, yet there is still one bigger hot button topic: Death. Death trumps outsourcing when it comes to losing votes. Otherwise, we wouldn't pay mercenaries to die for our country in our frivolous wars -- we'd be willing to do it ourselves.

knotmag.com