SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Srexley who wrote (543569)2/21/2004 1:25:27 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Respond to of 769667
 
Yeah. The guy lies and lies, constantly repeating my positions with changes and then assaulting the changes. hehe. He rails against Coulter and sounds precisely like her Sodomite counterpart.

To be sure, I don't mind being insulted by a Sodomite. But I can't help but point out the hypocrisy.



To: Srexley who wrote (543569)2/21/2004 1:31:34 PM
From: Kevin Rose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Whoa, there. If you go back and read the prior posts, you'll find that JP slung the insults fast and hard, and that I was very restrained. Unfortunately, that seems to encourage people like him. They're like the bullies in the schoolyard; at some point, you've got to poke them in the eye.

You are stating your opinion as fact

Of course I do, as does everyone else. Alternately, we could wrap every sentence in 'IMHO', but that'd be a little tiresome. The author makes all sorts of similar statements.

As far as the causality, the point was that the article attempts to show such a causality, and fails. Lack of data or a coherent argument means there is no causality. Otherwise, I could state all sorts of nonsense as fact, and since no one could prove otherwise, it would be true.

For example: Bush causes hemorroids. Prove he doesn't.

See? Now, if you say that Bush doesn't cause hemorroids, no one questions your logic. But, using JP's logic, the above is perfectly valid.