SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (543622)2/21/2004 5:57:57 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
52% say Dump Bush!

52pc say dump Bush: poll
From correspondents in Washington
22feb04
FIFTY-two per cent of registered US voters do not want US President George W. Bush to be re-elected to a second term in office, while 43 per cent do, according to an opinion poll released today.

The Newsweek magazine survey found 38 per cent of registered voters thought Bush was "somewhat likely" to be re-elected this year, while 31 per cent said that outcome was "very likely".

At the same time, only 48 per cent of Americans polled approved of the way Bush was handling the job of president, the same as one week ago.

In the wake of the controversy over the president's service in the National Guard at the time of the Vietnam War, 49 per cent of those surveyed said they were inclined to believe that Bush fulfilled his obligations, while 33 per cent had serious doubts.

Fifty-eight per cent said they believed Bush was an honest person by nature, while 34 per cent did not see him that way.








Meanwhile, 68 per cent of respondents said American jobs and foreign competition would be very important in determining their vote for president this year.

When asked which presidential candidate would do the best job of protecting American jobs and creating new ones, regardless of the candidate they supported, 35 per cent of those polled chose Bush, 31 per cent preferred Democratic Massachusetts Senator John Kerry and 18 per cent North Carolina Senator John Edwards, another Democrat.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (543622)2/21/2004 9:02:57 PM
From: Kenneth V. McNutt  Respond to of 769670
 
<o>Wake up, people.

JOZEF HAND-BONIAKOWSKI

Wells, Vermont


The usual left wing bullsh*t. Liars figure and figures lie. The VA budget under Bush has increased 23% since he took office, helping to make up for years of neglect under William(the Coward)Clinton, who balanced the budget on the backs of the hated Military, and veterans. The statement Bush, or the Republicans, are cutting the VA are pure hogwash. Many Veterans organizations wanted a larger budget, who doesn't want more money, but they were suggested less by the House, including Democrats, and called it a sell out. This year alone the VA budget under Bush will increase 6.3%. Basically, some of the Vets groups are being used by the Demonut Party for political gain. Shame! These are the same idiots who claim , from the other side of their mouth, the Bush deficit is too high. No eligible veterans are turned away from medical service. The co-pay increase applies only to the veterans not disabled, and over the income threshold level. I am one of those, and I appreciate the what the VA offers me. My government does not owe me a cent for my service, but the VA does help with the medications. Believe it or not, there are some financial un-needy Vets with full medical coverage that prefer to use VA medical Facilities. If they are on Medicare the VA bills the Medicare for the treatment, or their insurer, but this group is on a first come first served basis. Veterans with service connected disabilities are first priority, those with incomes below a certain threshold are next. I am referring to those vets with no service connected disabilities. You will find their are many who claim service connected disabilities to bilk the system and they may go through a review process before their claim is settled. These are some of those you hear complaining about the VA. All veterans fall under a rating system of 1 to 8, where #1 are the most disabled and deserve, and receive the first priority for treatment. No's 7 and 8 are vets with non-service connected disabilities but are allowed VA services under certain conditions of income or illness.
KM



To: stockman_scott who wrote (543622)2/21/2004 10:28:15 PM
From: denizen48  Respond to of 769670
 
That makes me sick. Rah-rah when it comes to spending public money with their special interests, but screw the regular American. Pretty speeches belied by their actions.