SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (543656)2/21/2004 8:56:20 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Respond to of 769670
 
All but one state, Mississippi, seem to have similar age requirements for marriage, 18. If you're younger you need permission. In Miss. you must be 21, contrary to what you might have guessed. Arizona allows cousins to marry if they are over 65. Other rules involve blood tests. It seems from cursory examination states have fairly wide discretion over these rules. Some specifically mention civil union and even reach out to those in this category to give them the legal status of married couples.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (543656)2/22/2004 12:05:24 AM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 769670
 
State laws govern such matters, which is why SF is out of line.

~SB~



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (543656)2/22/2004 12:07:50 AM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Anyone wonder what legal standing San Francisco has to file suit against the state on this matter? If I was a taxpayer in SF, I'd be hot that my tax dollars were being spent on something outside the bounds of the city's authority. This is an abuse of office by the SF mayor, and at taxpayer expense.

~SB~



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (543656)2/22/2004 8:45:01 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Respond to of 769670
 
If it is allowed by the agreed upon laws governing the state and country, I have no problem with it, as long as I am not forced to support it. I don't even care if the entire country wishes to support it. I now am at a point where I only wish the vote to take place. I wish to know concretely how far America has sunk.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (543656)2/22/2004 10:30:43 AM
From: Peter O'Brien  Respond to of 769670
 
What if the city voted that their residents don't have
to pay any state income tax either?

Would you be in favor of that?

I doubt the California attorney general
would be "dragging his feet" to enforce state
law if that happened!