Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (543662)	2/22/2004 12:04:12 AM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Given Scalia's brilliance, I would not be surprised if someone always voted with him. ~SB~

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (543662)	2/24/2004 8:34:50 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Not calling you a liar but.........OK, you're a liar! Can you show that they always* voted together.?...that can be shown with Thomas and Scalia..* Ruling: Airline Can Be Liable for Asthma, Smoke Death Tue Feb 24,11:44 AM ET By James Vicini WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) ruled on Tuesday that an airline can be held liable for the death of a passenger from a severe asthma attack caused by exposure to secondhand smoke. Related Links • Opinion: Olympic Airways v. Husain (FindLaw) The 6-2 ruling was a defeat for Olympic Airways, the Greece-based airline that challenged a $1.4 million award against it in the case of a 52-year-old doctor from California who died on a 1998 flight from Athens to New York. The airline had argued that it cannot be held liable under the Warsaw Convention, an international treaty on airline liability, when a passenger's pre-existing medical condition has been aggravated in the aircraft cabin. The U.S. Justice Department (news - web sites) disagreed. It said an airline's unreasonable refusal to assist a passenger who becomes ill during an international flight, in violation of its own policies and industry standards, can lead to liability. The case involved Dr. Abid Hanson. After boarding the flight in Athens, Hanson and his family discovered they were in nonsmoking seats near the smoking section, which was not separated by a partition. A flight attendant repeatedly rejected requests from Hanson's daughter to move him to a different seat. The attendant said the flight was full, even though there were 11 empty seats. After Hanson died on the plane, his family sued and claimed his death stemmed from a severe asthma attack caused by inhaling secondhand smoke. The airline argued that his death stemmed from an allergic reaction to food or some other medical problem unrelated to the smoke. A federal court in California determined that smoke exposure was the primary cause of death, said the flight attendant's actions amounted to "willful misconduct," and awarded the family $1.4 million in damages. A U.S. appeals court in San Francisco upheld the decision. It said the flight attendant's failure to assist Hanson fell within the treaty's definition of an "accident" for which the airline can be held liable. The high court upheld the decision awarding the $1.4 million in damages. Justice Clarence Thomas (news - web sites) said the conduct at issue constituted an "accident" under the treaty and the airline can be held liable because of its unusual and unexpected refusal to assist a passenger. Justices Antonin Scalia (news - web sites) and Sandra Day O'Connor (news - web sites) dissented. Scalia said appellate courts in Australia and Britain have issued decisions in the past year at odds with the high court's holding. "Tragic though Dr. Hanson's death may have been, it does not justify the court's putting us in needless conflict with other signatories to the Warsaw Convention," Scalia wrote.