Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3559)	2/22/2004 10:19:50 AM
From: redfish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

"His voice will add to the voice of the Democratic Presidential candidate. And then in the end he will drop out and endorse the Democratic nominee." That's what everybody said last time. Nader is an unprincipled, amoral, degenerate, compulsive-lying sack of dung.

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (3559)	2/22/2004 1:22:39 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

I'm unconcerned about the Nader candidacy siphoning votes off the democrats in the general election. I agree with you, Nader will just create more anti-republican buzz. We know from the primaries that the only reason there is any divisiveness in the democratic party is when voters feel that they have the luxury of branching off the mainstream dump Bush message. Like right now the Edwards/Kerry faction is fine because Edwards has a message and voters know that an Edwards vote is not going to impede dumping Bush in the fall. Whoever is the dem nominee (and it really looks like Kerry) will not have to worry about a divided electorate, the anti-Bush sentiment is too strong. On the republican side however, there are factions developing. The Christian right with its freaky social agenda stands to break off unless Bush decrees that gay marriage is a mortal sin and gay people should be buried alive. Also the fiscal conservatives can't be happy with Bush.