Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (277890)	2/22/2004 8:36:43 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

So far, the futures don't seem to care one way or the other ... Non-event?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (277890)	2/23/2004 4:59:55 AM
From: Oblomov	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Why do Democrats assume that Nader running will hurt them (or that he cost Gore the election in 2000)? The Republicans could claim that they would have won New Mexico (and would have won Florida even if Gore got the Nader vote) had it not been for Buchanan and the Libertarians. The people I know who voted for Nader in '00 voted for Perot in '92 and '96. Absent a Nader candidacy, they would probably vote for Bush. They loved John McCain, and preferred him as the Republican nominee.