Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lurqer who wrote (38257)	2/22/2004 3:02:52 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

What a waste; Shrub doesn't read stuff. I'm glad these guys finally came to the party, even if they got there 20 years late. Maybe they should read this... Great Barrier Reef Faces Major Coral Destruction Sat Feb 21,12:55 AM ET Add Science - Reuters to My Yahoo! SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australia's Great Barrier Reef will lose most of its coral cover by 2050 and, at worst, the world's largest coral system could collapse by 2100 because of global warming, a study released on Saturday said. Reuters Photo The study by Queensland University's Center for Marine Studies, commissioned by the Worldwide Fund for Nature, said that the destruction of coral on the Great Barrier Reef was inevitable due to global warming, regardless of what actions were taken now. "Under the worst-case scenario, coral populations will collapse by 2100 and the re-establishment of coral reefs will be highly unlikely over the following 200-500 years," said the report entitled "Implications of Climate Change for Australia's Great Barrier Reef." The Great Barrier Reef is the world's largest living reef formation stretching 2,000 km (1,300 miles) north to south along Australia's northeast coast. "Only if global average temperature change is kept to below two degrees Celsius can the Reef have any chance of recovering from the predicted damage," the report said. Coral has a narrow comfort zone and is highly stressed by a temperature rise of less than one degree Celsius. Water temperature rises of less than one degree coincided with the world's worst recorded coral bleaching episode in 1988. With bleaching, the warmer water forces out the algae that give coral its color and, if all are lost, the coral dies and the reef will crumble. In 1998, 16 percent of the world's coral died, with 46 percent of the Indian Ocean coral destroyed. Scientists project water temperatures to rise this century by between two and six degrees Celsius. "There is little to no evidence that corals can adapt fast enough to match even the lower projected temperature rise," said the Australian report. It said that by 2050 the Great Barrier Reef would annually experience stress levels higher than those witnessed in 1998 and, by 2100, stress levels globally for coral would be several times higher than 1998. "Coral cover will decrease to less than five percent on most reefs (in the Great Barrier Reef) by the middle of the century under even the most favorable assumptions," said the report. "Reefs will not disappear but they will be devoid of coral and dominated by other less appealing species, such as seaweed." The report said that over-fishing and pollution from coastal farms were also contributing to the destruction of coral on the Great Barrier Reef. It estimated that destruction of the Reef's coral could end up costing the Australian economy A$8 billion ($6.2 billion) and more than 12,000 jobs by 2020. The Great Barrier Reef supports huge fishing and tourism industries. Even under favorable conditions tourists would only be able to experience real corals in reef "theme parks," it said. story.news.yahoo.com

To: lurqer who wrote (38257)	2/23/2004 12:39:08 AM
From: elpolvo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

ld- this was particularly insightful: · By 2007 violent storms smash coastal barriers rendering large parts of the Netherlands inhabitable. and funnie too. :-) -ep

To: lurqer who wrote (38257)	2/23/2004 1:24:16 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 89467

Iraq's False Promises By Slavoj Zizek foreignpolicy.com January/February 2004 <<...If you want to understand why the Bush administration invaded Iraq, read Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams, not the National Security Strategy of the United States. Only the twisted logic of dreams can explain why the United States thinks that the aggressive pursuit of contradictory goals—promoting democracy, affirming U.S. hegemony, and ensuring stable energy supplies—will produce success...>>