Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (183301)	2/22/2004 9:20:23 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576112

hmaly, I'm going to stop responding to your posts, for a couple of reasons. 1> They don't fit on a page, and 2> they wouldn't be worth reading if they did re: Solar though has a much bigger problem, than cleaning, and that is hazardous waste. All solar systems use hazardous chemicals to build them, and also the batteries needed to store the energy, can be massive, expensive, need to be replaced regularily, and can't be put in a dump. You want to decry the nuclear waste, while solar has 1000 times the hazardous waste. I never "decryed" nuclear or nuclear waste, in fact I said nuclear was important and necessary. You just don't care about the facts of what you post. You are willing to produce any contrived justification to support your position (and find 100 links that most times don't relate). It takes way to much time to even figure out your wacko logic, and then figure a way to unwind and return it to a semblance of reality. Good luck, enjoy... John