SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (30890)2/22/2004 7:57:02 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793914
 
Small states should be incorporated into larger ones by force if necessary. We could build a wall if they dont agree. <g>



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (30890)2/23/2004 6:42:03 AM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 793914
 
If you switch to going by overall vote totals, then only the population centers matter, not any of the small states.
First of all, that's quite an overstatement. A couple of gimme electors to the small states don't change the interstate balance all that much, not as much as the winner-take-all mentality changes the intra-state balance.

Secondly, population centers don't have much to do with states. I live in Virginia because I worked in DC and Virginia has the bedroom communities with the easier commute. Even after more than thirty years here, when people ask me where I'm from, I don't say Virginia, I say DC. I grew up in New Jersey, the bedroom state of New York City and Philadelphia. Populations don't aggregate by states but rather around cities.

Thirdly, what role need the states, as entities independent of their populations, have in electing a president? Everything else is organized by state. States make most of the laws. And federal laws are made by state representatives. Why does the state entity have to stick its nose in presidential elections as well? I can think of no good reason. Even if there is one, surely it doesn't trump the opportunity for all citizens to play a role in electing their president. I'd rather disenfranchise the state as an entity than its citizens.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (30890)2/25/2004 3:04:52 AM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 793914
 
And if the popular vote is close and contested, there is no mechanism to resolve.

Imagine Florida on a national scale. Nightmare.

Derek