SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (10368)2/23/2004 12:03:38 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 10965
 
welcome back.

Enron? Enron?

Oh,, you mean Teresa's and Billy Bubba's favorite company?

Extended Discussion of John Kerry's Enron Hypocrisy:
NonprofitWatch ^

Senator John Kerry often bashes President Bush as to how Enron and other power companies have influenced the administration's energy policy. Kerry has used Enron as a pejorative adjective to describe dubious policies. Moreover, he gave $1000 to an Enron worker's relief fund because it had originated as a campaign donation from a wind company which was an Enron subsidiary. On the campaign stump, he charges corporations with having adversely impacted American democracy.

NonprofitWatch.org agrees with the Senator regarding his critiques of Enron and corporations, but suggests that this criticism should also be directed at his wife Teresa Heinz.

For eight years Teresa maintained a close relationship with Ken Lay. Since 1995 Mr. Lay served as a trustee of the Heinz Center for Economics, Environment and Science which Teresa founded to memorialize her late husband. Teresa, as well Fred Krupp the executive director of Teresa's main environmental philanthropy Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), also served as trustees.

Oddly, Mr. Lay served as a trustee even after Enron's demise -- a pamphlet obtained from the Heinz Center in the spring of 2003 listed him as a trustee affiliated with Lay Interests LLC. This seems odd in light of Kerry's highly critical comments of Enron.

It is probable that as a wealthy trustee of the group, Mr. Lay was a major donor to the project; about this NonprofitWatch.org has no information, but this should be something for Teresa and the Heinz Center to reveal to the public.

In light of Enron's demise and Ken Lay's leadership role in the scandal-ridden company, his service as a trustee is a poor commentary upon the work of the Heinz Center, besides being an embarrassment to the memory of Mr. Heinz.

Regarding Teresa, Mr. Kerry and his campaign have celebrated Teresa Heinz for her philanthropy, of which environment is a major part. However, NonprofitWatch.org suggests that a significant part of her environmental advocacy was shaped to benefit Enron's interests. Teresa long served as vice-chairperson of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), though she has stepped down from that role and is currently just a trustee. Teresa's Heinz Foundation has long been a major financial supporter of EDF. In light of Teresa's relationship to Enron's Ken Lay and her role with EDF, the below policy stances by EDF that benefited Enron raise questions regarding the ethics and integrity of Teresa's work.

-- In 1998 EDF opposed a ballot initiative Proposition 9 that would have repealed utility deregulation in California. When the bill to deregulate California's energy market passed the legislature in 1996, EDF failed to voice opposition. Energy deregulation proved to be a gross catastrophe for California in terms of economics and the environment but was of great benefit to energy companies such as Enron. Teresa's close ties to Enron's Ken Lay raise the question of whether she was beguiled by Mr. Lay and his likely donations to the Heinz Center.

-- EDF was a major proponent of greenhouse gas emissions trading, a business-friendly approach to address global warming. While environmentalists criticize Bush regarding his opposition to the Kyoto Protocol, it should be noted that the Kyoto's trading clauses which EDF influenced have been criticized by some environmentalists as loopholes of the treaty. Enron was a strong supporter of Kyoto as the company looked forward to profiting from trading in greenhouse credits. In light of Enron's business shenanigans and the company's utter collapse, NonprofitWatch.org suggests that the emissions trading scheme may itself be a house of cards. Moreover, the capacity to trade depends upon low targets for emissions reductions. Here again, close ties to Ken Lay raise questions about the judgement of EDF.

-- EDF has long focused on environmental matters related to Brazil. When Enron built an environmentally-damaging pipeline through a biologically rich area of the Brazilian Amazon, EDF politely never publicly condemned Enron. Only after Enron's fall did EDF utter public criticism, in an email sent out to the group's email list.

-- Other examples of EDF's support for Enron will be described in a future briefing.

Whether Teresa had an active or ignorant role in the above is not clear and probably could never be fully ascertained; however either case reflects poorly upon her philanthropy environmentalism. Her close ties to Enron's Ken Lay cast questions about both the integrity of Teresa's philanthropy and the environmentalism of Teresa's EDF. At the very least there is the troubling appearance of conflict of interest coinciding with policy by EDF in the interest of Enron.

Every time you turn on the news and hear about Enron Corp. and its bankruptcy, you hear all about how George W. Bush allowed Enron to influence his energy policy. The collapse of Enron is the best thing to ever happen to John McCain, Russ Feingold, Marty Meehan, and Chris Shays. It's given them a pulpit from which to preach from. It's given new life to campaign finance reform. So the Democrats are loving this for several reasons: it's given a huge boost to campaign finance reform supporters, it has given them an example of the eeeevil Republican-caused recession, and they think that they can turn it into President Bush's own personal scandal. Clinton had Monicagate, fine they say, give Bush Enrongate.



Even though they cannot come up with a single bit of evidence to connect Bush or his Administration to Enron...in fact, the Bush Administration REFUSED to help Enron when asked...the Democrats keep trying to connect the Bush Administration to the Enron bankruptcy. Which is why this newest finding is so deliciously interesting. According to The Washington Times, the Clinton Administration gave over $1 billion to Enron's overseas projects. ONE BILLION DOLLARS FOLKS! This is not a hand-out, this is a take-the-whole-damn-cash-drawer. Why haven't we heard this in the news? Simple, the media loves this so-called Bush connection. Folks, watch the news. You won't hear anything about Clinton, but you'll hear all about the "help" Bush gave Enron. Even though he refused to help! Unbelievable.



Between 1993 and 2000, Enron proposed 20 projects to build power plants, natural-gas pipelines, and other facilities all around the world. Clinton and his government cronies financed 19 of these projects. Oh, and remember the Kyoto Treaty that Bush (rightfully) yanked us out of? Well, that treaty was pushed for by Enron, and signed by Clinton. So add another Clinton-tie to the list.



And as for Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay? We've all heard how Bush called Lay "Kenny Boy" and all about how they are such great friends. But get this: Clinton called Lay an exemplary "corporate citizen" at a White House event because of Enron's enlightened personnel policies. And it doesn't stop there. Ken Lay was Bill Clinton's golf partner on numerous occasions, he slept in the Lincoln Bedroom, and attended several of Clinton's coffees along with other Enron executives. And yet we hear about Bush and Lay?!? Give me a break.