SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (183331)2/23/2004 1:14:26 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1575426
 
Al, One would ask why he does not form a cooperative relationship with the party most closely aligned with his views...not by running on a hopeless ticket and helping the candidate farthest from his goals. You could say that he is a stupid man and be perfectly justified.

Nader is just another rebel without a clue. Of course, that's exactly why the Democrats are panicking ... because a lot of their votes come from rebels without a clue.

Anyone want to bet that at this moment, Terry McAuliffe is urging Pat Buchanan to run?

Tenchusatsu



To: Alighieri who wrote (183331)2/23/2004 2:33:15 PM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575426
 
Al Re....The guy can't win. He is obstinate enough to run to the end and manage to achieve the direct opposite of what he stands for.

And by opposing him, the Dems are achieving the direct opposite of what the Dems. want to stand for, which will be far more costly to the Dems in the end. How can Kerry go out and rail against the lobbyists for big corporations, and at the same time, condemn Nader, who preaches the same message? Embrace the message, and take it away from Nader, and limit the votes to Nader on that issue.

You could say that he is a stupid man and be perfectly justified.

After all these yrs, of the left, glorifying his intelligence, now all you want to call him stupid. Stupid is as stupid does.

I will give you another stupid attack idea. Read it and tell me what you think.

nytimes.com.



To: Alighieri who wrote (183331)2/23/2004 4:39:14 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575426
 
The guy can't win. He is obstinate enough to run to the end and manage to achieve the direct opposite of what he stands for. One would ask why he does not form a cooperative relationship with the party most closely aligned with his views...not by running on a hopeless ticket and helping the candidate farthest from his goals. You could say that he is a stupid man and be perfectly justified.

Al, he is a stupid man because his ego is so huge. To hear his announcement this AM, he was working very hard to convince us and himself that he had no choice but to announce his candidacy. Its too bad, because in the end, he either will be reviled or made to look the fool.

ted