SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: microhoogle! who wrote (3665)2/23/2004 4:48:29 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
You and I agree on Nader. The intriguing thing about Nader is that he is more well versed on the global economy than most Green (or independent) candidates. As far as the media is concerned he fills the void that Dean left. So we'll probably see more of him than he really deserves, but I doubt he siphons off many votes this time.

The whole discussion about what happened in 2000 and why Bush won over Gore is irrelevant now. Most then thought Bush and Gore were similar in terms of principles. Anybody remember W's slogan in 2000- "W is for women?!" Laughable now. Whatever dubya ran on or won on, will not happen again imho.



To: microhoogle! who wrote (3665)2/25/2004 4:23:42 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Re: The only wild card is.. if he starts going negative against democratic nominee.

Nader became a willing GOP quisling in 2000:

blog.deanforamerica.com

VOTE FOR NADER and you, fool, are voting for George Bush.