Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: broadstbull who wrote (277977)	2/23/2004 5:46:30 PM
From: Oblomov	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I voted for Browne as well, and the Libertarian candidate (Nolan?) will probably be my first choice this time - Indiana usually is solidly Republican in Presidential contests, so a third party candidate isn't much of a threat to anyone. My fiance likes Nader, despite the fact that she is a conservative Catholic... she, like many Americans, pulls for the underdog despite the ideological differences. She will probably vote for Bush, or maybe Nader, but definitely not Kerry or Edwards. Ideology doesn't motivate her, or other swing voters. What does is a cluster of attitudes, beliefs, policies, and observed personality traits. Because this approach to selecting a President is murky and difficult to articulate or measure, every four years the media ponder "the mystery of the swing voter". Most journalists just don't understand.