Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (183465)	2/24/2004 6:30:34 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575725

Ted Re... was not responding to what you said to DR. I was responding to what you said to me. Fair enough. Then here is my first response to you, on this topic. Reread it, and tell me, how you came to your conclusion, that I said you Dems attacked Ralphs policies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To:tejek who wrote (183370) From: hmaly Monday, Feb 23, 2004 5:47 PM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 183475 Ted Re...The Dems are attacking Nader and not his policies because they fear his presidential run will act as a spoiler like in 2000 and give Bush the election once again when he doesn't deserve to win. That is exactly my point. You dems. first blamed the USSC, then the Fl voters, and now Nader, for your loss in 2000; and here you are it again, afraid the same will happen in 04. Thats the main reason you are dissing Ralph, not because you disagree with his policies. You claim to be the party of the intelligensia, and inclusion, and here you have turned into the party of stupid petty jealousies, and exclusion. Nader had it right, when he said "Al cost Al the election." If you lose this time, you will once again have only yourself to blame again.