Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (31186)	2/24/2004 1:51:10 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793838

But it's ok to wax warm and fuzzy over hetero sex. Didn't you know that? Why sex is serious enough to open up the constitution. I thought the ERA was a ridiculous reason to open up the constitution- but this has that beat by several miles. Who cares who puts whose genitals where, and who wants a government imprimatur on such putting (or petting)? I have to say I think our country is stark raving bonkers if it goes along with viewing this as a "priority". We certainly have issues that threaten our survival- a supply of clean air, clean water, access to health care, access to a safe food supply, protections from new harmful viruses and bacteria, global climate change, meteor impacts, nuclear war and nuclear terrorism, etc- but the protection of marriage?