SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (124986)2/24/2004 1:15:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 


I did not say anything about north or south, only that he operated in a no-fly zone


You said he operated in the Kurdish no-fly zone, which was in the north. Baghdad and Salman Pak were never in a no-fly zone. Who are you trying to kid here?



To: GST who wrote (124986)2/24/2004 11:33:01 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Nobody works harder at spinning this story than you do --spin away.

Well.. ain't that the pot calling the kettle black...

Iraq is a "playground" for terrorists now??

As if it wasn't before? Hell, it was enough fun for the likes of Abu Abbas and Abu Nidal to think they could actually live safely there...

And who is now bearing much of the brunt of militant terrorism? It's the Iraqi people, not the US forces..

Islamic militancy has really found itself required to focus on a new enemy.. The prospect of a secular, or even worse, a Shiite Iraq, provided some measure of international legitimacy..

That means they aren't spending as much time focusing on how to attack the US... They have to spend their resources there in Iraq..

As for those American servicemen who have sacrificed their lives.. the majority of them KNOW AND AGREED with the reasons the US went into Iraq.

So for you to try and cite them as some kind of support for your argument is a true desecration of everything they stood for during the lives they led.

Hawk