Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (544830)	2/24/2004 9:12:22 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 769667

This depends upon the hermaphrodite. Not all are the same. But they are defective and clearly so because (and here is your clue) they are almost ALWAYS infertile, partitioned by nature from humanity. Humans are not comprised of them. In some rare cases a hermaphrodite has fertility, but they never are fertile in both sexual identities. If the fertile hermaphrodite is a chromosomal male, then fundamentally that person is male, despite any contrary defects beyond the fundamental identity. If the person is chromosomal female, the person is obviously female. We ought not become confused by higher expressions here. We must deal only with essential you because in nature, it is essential you that has the capacity to either join with the rest of humanity or not.