To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (5416 ) 2/25/2004 9:30:05 AM From: GUSTAVE JAEGER Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039 Re: The two jets did not bring down those two towers and building #7. All were perfectly demolished inside their own footprints. A perfect demolition job. This could only have been an inside job with a lot of work and preparation. Well, I just finished reading the following:Eyewitness Reports Persist Of Bombs At WTC Collapse By Christopher Bollyn Exclusive to American Free Press 12-2-1 Despite reports from numerous eyewitnesses and experts, including news reporters on the scene, who heard or saw explosions immediately before the collapse of the World Trade Center, there has been virtual silence in the mainstream media. Television viewers watching the horrific events of Sept. 11 saw evidence of explosions before the towers collapsed. Televised images show what appears to be a huge explosion occurring near ground level, in the vicinity of the 47-story Salomon Brothers Building, known as WTC 7, prior to the collapse of the first tower. Van Romero, an explosives expert and former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at New Mexico Tech, said on Sept. 11, "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse." The collapse of the structures resembled the controlled implosions used to demolish old structures and was "too methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures," Romero told The Albuquerque Journal hours after the attack. Implosions are violent collapses inwards, which are used to demolish buildings in areas of high density, to prevent damage to surrounding buildings. Precision-timed explosives are placed on strategic load-bearing columns and beams to cause the controlled collapse. Demolition experts say that towers are the most difficult buildings to bring down in a controlled manner. A tower tends to fall like a tree, unless the direction of its fall is controlled by directional charges. The WTC towers "smokestacked" neatly, falling within the boundaries of their foundations. [...]rense.com Actually, the theory of a controlled collapse of the WTC with planted explosives doesn't ruin my Russian-Israeli theory altogether. It does emphasize, however, the depth of the 911 complicity within the US (counter)intelligence apparatus... The way I factor it in is that the 911 masterminds wanted to be sure the whole plot wouldn't flop bigtime --with all four hijacked airliners successfully shot down by USAF fighters, for instance. After all, two of them were indeed shot down by the USAF. So, if for one reason or another, none of the airliners hit its assigned target then a Plan-B had to be launched... That means that it was not mandatory to set off the planted bombs once the WTC towers were hit, however, it was necessary to set them off retroactively speaking because the WTC crashes themselves would have led to an all-out shakedown of the towers by FBI investigators and, therefore, the planted bombs would have been discovered anyway. And that, in turn, would have fatally flawed the whole Bin-Laden blame-spiel since, as you rightly noted, the planting of bombs within the WTC towers cannot be accomplished without inside/American accomplices.... Gus