Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (125055)	2/25/2004 1:02:47 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I just lost a longer exposition inadvertently, so I will cut to the chase: I think it is a good idea to plan against contingencies. I always said that the report envisioned a worst case scenario. I never denied that the authors took it seriously, I merely said that it did not constitute an official rebuttal of Administration policy, even obliquely. My reference to malinterpretation came in the wake of your denial that you meant to imply that this report had a bearing on the Administration's position on global warming or Kyoto. It is true that I did not read all pertinent matter in the thread, but I found myself at a loss to know why we were discussing the work in the face of your disavowals, and I was beyond caring to puzzle it out.......