Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (545356)	2/25/2004 4:53:17 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

It is hard for most of us to understand how you could be so stupid. I spelled it out for you...as have many others here. One is either born male or female, discounting any physical deformities in the VERY rare case. And even that is explained. If two are Siamese twins, and one has a sexual relation with a member of the opposite sex, there must be three present. Does that mean it is ok for all of us to have three present? Of course not. All the rest is choice. I had a friend when I was very young(6-8 range) and we lived close to a convenience store. He would always go in and steal candy. Does that mean he was born a thief, and will be a thief all his life? Of course not. What you are lying about is saying that homos are born. You cannot prove it.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (545356)	2/25/2004 6:22:19 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Then why don't you answer the question as to when you chose to be a hetero, and I give you the benefit of the doubt here. I don't think that PROLIE ever made that choice. I find that the more homophobic someone is the more likely they are trying to hide something. I think that PROLIE has had homosexual tendencies his whole life. He's managed to keep his urges "in check". But if the gays start marrying each other, he may not be able to control himself any further. That of course is the underlying reason as to why he favors a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. And what the heck is the double speak of wanting to ban gay marriage and then support civil unions? I can hardly tell the difference. This is too funny! Orca