Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (545435)	2/25/2004 8:03:24 PM
From: Skywatcher	Respond to of 769667

AHAHHAHHA...... hey...as long as THEY have their health care....tough for the rest..... WWJD?????? GET OUT OF IRAQ AND GIVE HIS PEOPLE HEALTH CARE...... CC

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (545435)	2/25/2004 8:06:02 PM
From: Skywatcher	Respond to of 769667

Bush...AGAIN TRYING TO DESTROY ALL VESTIGES OF NATURE THAT WE HAVE LEFT!!!! Again, an Assault on Alaska If at first you don't succeed in despoiling an environmental treasure, try, try again. That's apparently the White House motto for drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The Senate should stop President Bush again, as it has for two years now. The Bush administration has been no friend to the Alaskan environment in recent months. In December, the Forest Service announced it would strip protections from the Tongass National Forest, allowing loggers to build roads to choice stands of old-growth trees. In January, the president's budget brought back his twice-defeated proposal to sell oil leases in the wildlife refuge, and Interior Secretary Gale Norton approved a plan to open millions of acres of the North Slope to drilling and loosen requirements for environmental safeguards. Of these, the annual presidential assault on the 19-million-acre wildlife refuge is hardest to fathom. It would take eight to 10 years to get at the oil, which, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, would meet the nation's energy needs for only six months. A very modest increase in the fuel efficiency of the nation's cars would save more oil than that. Seven environmental groups have filed suit over the North Slope, which lies to the west of the refuge and for three decades has produced about a fifth of U.S. domestic oil. The suit rightly objects not to the drilling but to the lack of environmental safeguards for sensitive areas. Already, according to a report last year by the National Academy of Sciences, drilling in the North Slope has reduced the reproductive rate of caribou and birds and destroyed thousands of acres of tundra, mostly because of the roads built to serve the oil wells. Road construction also would mean bulldozing swaths of the Tongass, which would be exempted from the no-road rule that now protects nearly 60 million acres of national forests. Logging big tracts of old-growth trees would be allowed. And federal subsidies would help build the roads, forcing the public to bear the costs of damaging the federal lands that belong to it. As with the wildlife refuge, it would take congressional action to stop the Tongass plan, probably by stripping funding for road subsidies. Fending off attacks on Alaska's environment could become a time-consuming legislative job. CC