Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (12805)	2/26/2004 7:58:59 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

always dangerous to argue law with lawyers......:-) correct me if I am wrong, but the Supreme court deals with issues of constitutionality and the only way to get in front of the supreme court is to challenge the current laws. The process has to start somewhere and it will be many years before it reaches the supreme court. If this is an issue of constitutionality (which I believe it is) then it is the supreme court that will determine the outcome, not general consensus. And if the supreme court finds in favor of gay marriage, then there will be no constitutional amendment.