Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: H-Man who wrote (4366)	2/27/2004 10:18:18 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 81568

H-Man, it is Bush's record that people are interested in. When people who do not have jobs question his giving tax breaks to corporations to take jobs overseas, you raise the issue of Heinz. So my question is what is Bush doing. Why can he not stop the Heinz company from doing that? You are just making the people's case. You are proving that Kerry is right on track. Yes right on track. Kerry did not establish those companies is it? As a Senator, it was not his charter to bring these "Bendict Arnolds" back, is it not? It is Bush job as President. Tomorrow, I would hope not that you accuse Kerry for not creating job opportunities. So personal attacks such as on Heinz do not work especially when people are angry. Let us get posts from you and others not on what Heinz does but what all the other companies, 140 million of them do. I have no problem with anyone, Kerry included taking special interest money provided they do not allow that to influence their decisions. If a President takes 140 million dollars and then campaigns for making their tax cuts permanent then it is clearly a conflict of interest. On the other hand a small company in San Diego donated about $100,000 to Senator Kerry and all the Senator did was to ensure that the missile program remained intact so that the 100 employees could remain employed. Now anyone with some pea of a sense in politics would concede that Kerry taking money to ensure that he can fight to keep their jobs i much better than for Bush to take money and fight so that he can make their tax breaks permanent and give then tax breaks to take their jobs overseas.