Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (7283)	2/27/2004 11:06:30 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

I understand that Kerry's campaign has secret plans in hand for the invasion of Saudia Arabia if he should be elected. I'm told that the plans include an initial program of attacks in the US to be carried out by DNC staffers posing as Saudis. I'm not sure how much credence I give these reports, but they seem more credible than some of the other conspiracy theories discussed on this thread, so they're quite possibly true.

To: tsigprofit who wrote (7283)	2/27/2004 11:34:37 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

This is the problem I've had with the anti-Bush side. It comes off as basically opposing Bush on Iraq and terror. Personally, I think the nation would vote for Bush if that's the debate. I'd like to see Kerry or Edwards really go out on a limb with specific economic proposals with real numbers and also not be so wishy washy on this goofy trend of having government involved in censorship, gay marriage and spending billions going to Mars. If they were dynamic and attacked the fringe element, then they would attract many of us moderates.