SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (31985)2/27/2004 6:31:32 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793575
 
<<Bush get any wounds from those bar stool falls?????>>

Maybe he did but didn't put himself in for purple hearts like kerry did.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (31985)2/27/2004 7:06:59 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793575
 
"You want to see pictures of his wounds????? "

That's not what she asked. She asked about the nature &
extent of his three Purple Heart related injuries.

Per this article, they weren't very extensive. If true,
his hero status might not be as haughty as one would
think, considering that most thrice wounded soldiers end
up with at least one serious wound. I doubt that there are
multitudes of triple Purple Heart soldiers that came away
almost 100% unscathed like Kerry, yet present themselves
everywhere they go as a war hero.

Mr. Kerry was assigned to Swiftboat 44 on December 1,
1968. Within 24 hours, he had his first Purple Heart. Mr.
Kerry accumulated three Purple Hearts in four months with
not even a day of duty lost from wounds, according to his
training officer. It’s a pity one cannot read his Purple
Heart medical treatment reports which have been withheld
from the public. The only person preventing their release
is Mr. Kerry.


Message 19857412



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (31985)2/27/2004 7:25:07 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793575
 
This guy & 100 other folks don't think very highly about
the facts surrounding Kerry's three Purple Hearts, ET AL.

Veterans and the Kerry Controversy
February 26, 2004

Thomas D. Segel

It seems the spin-doctors have gone to work early in the John F. Kerry campaign. As he makes his run to be the Democrat nominee in the race for the presidency, there is great trumpeting of his combat service in Vietnam, along with the medals he was awarded for that service. In true political fashion the spin machine wants to proclaim him a distinguished hero, while at the same time cautioning all who happen to raise an eyebrow that nobody should question Kerry’s service or valor.

I would argue that anyone who experienced shots fired in anger has the right to ask questions about any other person who makes similar claims. John Kerry and company have opened some ugly wounds and brought back to the surface sad memories of a painful war. They should be prepared to field and reply to any and all questions about the candidate’s actions in that long ago Vietnam.

To be objective, it must be pointed out Kerry did serve off the coast of Vietnam aboard the USS Gridley for six months between December 1967 and June 1968. He was an officer in the electrical department during a relatively uneventful short tour.

On December 1, 1968 Kerry arrived in Vietnam and assumed command of Patrol Boat Fast “Swift Boat” #44, on which he served until late in January 1969. <font size=4>Records show that on December 2, 1968 he was slightly wounded in his arm, earning his first Purple Heart.<font size=3>

In late January, Kerry was transferred to “Swift Boat” #94. Records indicate the boat had 18 missions during the next 48 days. Almost all were in the MeKong Delta.
<font size=4>
According to military documents, Kerry sustained minor shrapnel wound to his left thigh on February 20, 1969. He was awarded his second Purple Heart.
<font size=3>
The actions, which unfolded on February 28, led to Lt. Kerry’s first award for valor. When his patrol craft received rocket fire from shore, he ordered his boat beached in the center of the enemy position. An enemy fighter jumped from an emplacement just a few feet from where the boat beached and attempted to flee. He was shot and wounded by the patrol craft gunner, firing a twin 50-caliber machine gun. As the wounded Viet Cong darted behind a shack for protection, the gunner fired an estimated 50 rounds through the building. Kerry than leaped from the boat and ran to the shack. Though it is not stated in the citation, <font size=4>Kerry’s later remarks were that he administered a “coup de grace” to the wounded enemy<font size=3> and returned to his boat with a B-40 rocket and launcher. He then moved his boat approximately 800 yards further up river to suppress enemy fire. He again ordered his boat beached and personally led a landing party ashore in pursuit of the enemy. Later, sweeping the area the crew uncovered a supply dump, which was destroyed. The citation lauds Kerry’s daring and personal courage in attacking a numerically superior force during that highly successful mission. He was awarded the Silver Star.
<font size=4>
On March 13, 1969 when his “Swift Boat” was exiting the Bay Hap River a mine detonated wounding Lt Kerry in the right arm.<font size=3> The five boats in that patrol all started receiving fire from the riverbanks. Kerry discovered he had a man overboard and went to assist. While in an exposed position in the bow of the boat, he pulled the man aboard, and then directed his boat to assist another damaged boat to safety. For this action, Kerry was awarded the Bronze Star with Combat “V”. He was also awarded his third Purple Heart.
<font size=4>
On March 17, 1969, just four days after the Bay Hap River action, Lieutenant (jg) John F. Kerry requested relief under a rule, which allowed recipients of three Purple Hearts to be reassigned to a non-combat duty. He was returned to the United States. Shortly after his return, Kerry requested an early release from the Navy so that he might campaign for Congress.<font size=3>

This is the brief four-month combat duty of John F. Kerry, as closely as it can be reconstructed. He has talked repeatedly of his Navy service, but has never explained the details of his personal involvement.
<font size=4>
Retired Marine Major Frank Stolz of Round Rock, Texas has some deep concerns about Kerry’s “Swift Boat” exploits and his swifter tour of duty in Vietnam.<font size=3> “He returned to the USA after all of four months with the swift boats”, says Stolz. “He reminded his Commanding Officer that he had three Purple hearts and should be allowed to leave the combat zone. <font size=4>His behavior during this period was reckless and his medals are in question. There was killing of unarmed civilians and later a wounded soldier, which earned him a Silver Star. He had to do a lot of the writing for this award himself, or he talked his crew members into writing him up, as he was the only officer.”<font size=3>

Stolz points out an important fact that is never mentioned when Kerry campaign personnel speak of their candidate’s heroism. <font size=4>“Wounded enemy soldiers are brought to the rear for questioning, as required by the Geneva Conventions, UN policy and U.S. military doctrine.<font size=3> Only when the enemy soldier is fighting or when returning him would jeopardize your unit is it permissible to kill him. Obviously that wounded soldier could have been carried to the swift boat, taken to the medics and then to the interrogators.”

Retired Army Colonel George R. Givens of Paige, Texas also has reservations as to the propriety of Kerry’s action under fire. <font size=4>“As I understand it, the enemy attacked his boat and he responded by grounding the boat, leaping off, and personally pursuing a wounded enemy, which he killed.

“At the time he was Commander of his Swift Boat. Think about it. In the middle of an attack, the Captain of the Ship runs his boat aground, leaves the boat and crew of five enlisted men behind, and conducts needless, single handed pursuit of a fleeing enemy, while his boat and crew are especially vulnerable to further attack by possible hidden forces.<font size=3>

“Swift Boats were not heavily armored or armed. One of the few defensive weapons they had was maneuverability, including leaving the area to call in air strikes or artillery. By intentionally grounding his boat so he could get off and conduct a one man chase, he took away one of the primary defenses of his boat.”

There are still more questions veterans have about the four months of John Kerry’s combat service. <font size=4>Most notable in the mind of this writer, are more than 100 email messages wanting to know the details of his three Purple Heart awards.

There are many who point to something which is traditional among combat troops and a concern of those in command…large numbers fail to report minor wounds, knowing that if they do so it most likely will mean their removal from the unit and treatment at some medical facility. They just don’t want to leave the members of their squads, platoons, or companies. Most men in combat units develop an unbreakable bond with their brothers in arms. They won’t abandon those in their units, if there is any way to avoid separation.

So, in the case of John Kerry…ALL want to know…IF the wounds were minor, who treated them? IF there were no medical personnel, who decided they were combat wounds? IF it was decided they were wounds, who recommended they be submitted to receive the Purple Heart? And finally…IF three Purple Hearts were the ticket out of combat, why did it take four long days for this officer to request relief and abandon those in his command?<font size=3>

There are dozens upon dozens of related “Kerry Questions” but they must be addressed in another commentary.

opinioneditorials.com