Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FaultLine who wrote (32371)	2/29/2004 7:18:05 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793648

Were you there wstera_02? I was. If you weren't, what do you know anyway? Good line Ken. Let's tell Poet, E and the rest of the REMF's posting here the same thing.

To: FaultLine who wrote (32371)	2/29/2004 7:25:43 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 793648

Faultline and Unclewest. I wasnt there and i dont have a clue how extensive the war crimes were. Back then, i believed them to be widespread probably because of john kerry et al. How could you not believe kerry back then? What could he possibly have to gain? It didnt seem that it would ever be of help to him going forward. So i had to accept it. As i get older i get more confused and this question goes back into the unresolved category. Mike

To: FaultLine who wrote (32371)	2/29/2004 7:48:27 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 793648

"Were you there wstera_02?" Why did you limit this question only to me? Are you saying that if I wasn't there, then the sources I have provided that clearly discredit Kerry are all somehow invalid? Why hasn't Kerry ever spoken out when so many of his sources were being discredited by so many credible people? In fact, Kerry is now on record lying about what he said back then. Why would he try to distance himself from these very serious allegations while he is running for President? Why didn't Kerry ever try to get these alleged massive war crimes prosecuted ? (his testimony before the Senate did not include any request for an official investigation as I recall) Kerry used his fame gained from his anti-war activities to become a politician. Why hasn't he ever used some of his political capital to hold investigations into the alleged widespread military implementation of massive war crimes so they never happen again? Doesn't that seem odd? Give me a legitimate reply to each of these questions & I'll respond to your attempts to impugn my reputation.