SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gamesmistress who wrote (32456)3/1/2004 8:54:00 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793670
 
Actually this would be a good amendment but like when reagan pushed for no term limits for pres, this one should not un-grandfather in anyone currently over 35 years old so no arnold. mike



To: gamesmistress who wrote (32456)3/1/2004 8:58:35 AM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793670
 
If we are going to amend the Const. regarding the presidency, I would prefer an amendment that provided for a single six-year term.

The way we run it now is ludicrous. The president has to spend way too much time pandering and running for re-election.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News