Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI members discuss Survivor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JakeStraw who wrote (605)	3/1/2004 11:48:36 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2981

Strategically I think that it was wise to get rid of hatch sooner rather than later. That was the mistake that was made on the first survivor, everyone knew that they wanted to get rid of him, but figured they could wait till the next time. Really like the way that Jerri is playing. She's keeping that smile on her face but she hasn't forgotten colby's play at all. Big Tom may be in jeopardy, but I would keep him around as the person i would want to go up against at the final three. Can't believe that there isn't any talk of breaking up Boston Rob and Amber. That alliance has to be dissolved. Rob is too strong, his team needs to get past their starry eyes from his performance at last week's challenge and realize that it means that he is a huge threat. Was really surprised that the vote wasn't more mixed last week.