Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (7379)	3/1/2004 7:31:03 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7720

Constitutional amendment is over the top But when courts legislate and say that the constitution requires same sex marriages, then the only answer is a constitutional amendment. Laws won't do it. A constitutional amendment isn't over the top at all. It's the only possible alternative to accepting full marital rights for homosexuals. If you think that's over the top, then you have to think that trying to prevent homosexual marriage at all is over the top. Or do you have a not-over-the-top alternative to suggest?