SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: redfish who wrote (196)3/3/2004 8:31:31 AM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 425
 
The secular audience can, imo, be divided into three categories:

(1) not interested, doesn't see it, pays it no attention
(2) interested, won't see it, is very much against it
(3) interested, will see it, doesn't get all the hoopla

The second category is the most interesting. This category attacks the film for a variety of reasons. They tend to feel very threatened by the christian religion, to the point of avoiding anything that remotely touches upon it.

For example, they will attack the film for deviating from scripture, without actually bothering to read the scripture. This is because they find it emotionally frightening to be exposed to such things.



To: redfish who wrote (196)3/15/2004 7:30:41 PM
From: Cyprian  Respond to of 425
 
>> For example, in Islam, Jesus is regarded as a prophet but not as the final prophet or the messiah <<

Jesus declared he was the Son of God. how can muslims call Jesus a prophet on the one hand and a liar on the other? you can't call someone a liar and a prophet at the same time.

this is all that is needed to expose the hypocrisy of that anti-christ religion islam.