Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Condor who wrote (9204)	3/2/2004 4:57:45 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

There are many bigger worser fish that should fry. All male!

To: Condor who wrote (9204)	3/2/2004 5:55:06 PM
From: aknahow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 110194

If a full service broker called me and said the CEO of a company was selling his stock, I probably would say sell. And I would not deny I said sell. I would point out I had no way of knowing I was receiving information my broker had not heard or read in the media. I took the information at face value, I was leaving on vacation. The sum of money was no beg deal, I just wanted to to the best job of decision making possible. I have not been charged with insider trading. Why not? Because the government know that the communication from the broker might well not have been understood to be insider information, as every day D13 s are filed with the SEC, and news reports a released detailing insider sales. I did not even think of asking him if he was making an improper disclosure. Any other questions?