SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (32827)3/3/2004 11:34:43 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 794042
 
Agree. At the other end of the spectrum, I will be outraged if Ebbers doesn't spend 20 years on the slammer. Because of information he signed off on, the market valued his company at $150 billion. We now know objectively it was worth $0.00. That's fraud. If he didn't know about it he committed a fraud on the owners of the company by accepting his gigantic salary.

Hang 'em high.



To: LindyBill who wrote (32827)3/3/2004 12:22:42 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 794042
 
will be enraged if they convict Martha Stewart. It would be absolutely outrageous.

i won't be enraged if they don't convict her, but would be pleasantly surprised if they do



To: LindyBill who wrote (32827)3/5/2004 11:15:40 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794042
 
Well, .....re Martha Stewart...? Interesting there has only been one other comment re the verdict today on PfP's....But if you look in the SI Search, you'll see LOTS of talk about it.

Clinton Can and DID lie UNDER Oath,to the Feds, and nothing happened.
Martha lied to the Feds, NOT under oath, and she gets convicted...

hummmmmm..


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News