SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (184027)3/3/2004 3:08:43 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Respond to of 1573694
 
Well, look at it this way, they have the right to look. They have more power than anyone else on earth to rip into those records, if they exit.

They have not. Why?

Maybe the conversation went like this, Well what are we going to find? Well I went to the dentist once to get free dental care.

What about your friends, who can we ask?

There is a reason for the rule of law. The presumption sometimes is that the person with the knowledge, if any, is in the best and EASIEST source of proof.

It may be 30 years now, but this is not the first time the question has come up. George has been in office for 20 years, or so and been in the public light for 30 or 40.

I have a picture of the kids in my 5th grade class, and I am not the President, only a Duke.

To an objective person, it doesn't pass the 'smell test'. It is that same 'smell test' that governs the rules of proof and evidence, in the law.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (184027)3/3/2004 4:59:56 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573694
 
Duke, I didn't see anything put forth by Bush's accusers that prove he didn't serve out his entire National Guard stint. All I see are accusations, mud-slinging, and FUD.

You know, kind of like what the AMDroids love to do when it comes to attacking Intel.


It sounded like to me that Duke knew about what he was talking.

ted