Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (7439)	3/8/2004 2:03:45 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7720

Yes, the OT is considered the Word of God just like the New T. The ordinances of the law in the OT don't have to be followed anymore though. The "old covenant" of the law was replaced by the "new covenant" of Jesus Christ. This is probably obvious, but I don't know, so will ask anyway. But if the OT is the word of God, who decided that the ordinance in the OT as given by God don't have to be followed any more? It's maybe apt and not too disrespectful here, Sidney, to quote Mark Twain: "It ain't the parts of the Bible that I can't understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand."