SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (548011)3/4/2004 3:08:35 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Spoken like a true Bushie..... "it wasn't imminent, it was a growing and dangerous threat"....LOL

I am amazed that so many people are mollified by the euphemistic approach.... What would a civil union deny a couple??? Would the churches perform civil union's??? Is it merely the word that you object to?



To: SecularBull who wrote (548011)3/4/2004 3:18:29 PM
From: JJL (Hijacked)  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
SB, what if a son chooses to live the rest of his life caring for his ill mother. They love each other, not sexually, but like a normal mother-son relationship. Would you agree and consent that after spending a lifetime of caring for his mother the son should be entitled to her pension benefits upon her death?

If two men living together are entitled to such benefits, why shouldn't a loving son be entitled to same?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News