Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (32941)	3/4/2004 12:27:24 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793896

That is a great question. I would start with wiping al quada off the face of the earth, helping the mideast toward peace, economic progress and political progress starting in iraq. A loss would be falling asleep at the wheel in ths fight against terror--being lulled to sleep so to speak. Another loss would be to allow our fp to be designed by the UN and the europeans or as kerry once said he would give them the right of first refusal. It is a more complicated question I know. How would you define it. BTW i think there is a 33% chance that once in office kerry would do the right things but cant vote for him until he makes this clear by breaking with move on and those folks. If he did, i would have to consider his candicacy on the three issues--the war where if he breaks with move.org he will be equal to bush, the economy where i do not accept his krugman rhetoric and on social issue where i am currenty leaning to the demo position. mike