Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (4606)	3/4/2004 5:33:26 PM
From: PROLIFE	Respond to of 90947

I agree, and here is some more disturbing stuff too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kerry Presidency Would Imperil America’s Security Now that John Kerry has successfully secured the Democrat nomination for president, all eyes must turn to his record and his campaign promises with respect to American security in general and the war against terror in particular. It’s not a pretty sight. Indeed, we at Crushkerry.com felt compelled to produce a video dramatizing John Kerry’s remarkable weakness on national security issues, symbolized by his horribly insensitive remarks to Tom Brokaw on January 29th, 2004 when he called the terror threat against the United States<font color=orange> “an exaggeration.</font>”<<<<<<<< Watch the video titled 'Exaggeration' at : crushkerry.com Hardly an isolated incident or misstatement, this single assertion perfectly embodies Kerry’s attitudes toward the federal government’s efforts to make our families safer from anti-American terrorist. Indeed, this notorious remark is endemic of the genuine lack of seriousness with which John Kerry and his liberal allies view the terror threat against our nation. We could have just as easily produced a video highlighting John Kerry’s assertion that we need “regime change” in Baghdad and Washington. John Kerry is THAT bad on national security issues. Throughout his career in the United States Senate, John Kerry has taken a timid, even passive, approach toward defending our shores. Throughout the 1990’s he proposed to gut our intelligence capabilities by a cumulative $4.5 billion. In 1997, Kerry asked his Senate colleagues, “Now that [the Cold War] struggle is over, why is it that our vast intelligence apparatus continues to grow?” The tragic answer came four years later in New York, Washington, DC and a field in rural Pennsylvania. Today, Kerry expects us to overlook his record. He would have America abandon the path President George W. Bush has led this country during the war on terror; a path that takes the fight to the streets of Baghdad instead of waiting for the terrorists to take the fight to the streets of Boston. Kerry would commit America to a law enforcement-style approach to terror. Under this approach, the September 11th attacks would be viewed as crimes, not acts of war. Not only is this a wholly irresponsible and indefensible position, it has been tried before and failed. The Kerry war against terror would take us back to the Clinton era, when America’s enemies gathered up arms unfettered and hatched schemes to kill our countrymen and women. Bill Clinton pursued the perpetrators of the attacks on the Khobar Towers and the USS Cole like a beat cop would pursue a petty street bandit. The result? The terrorist grew emboldened, brazen and increasingly hateful. John Kerry promise to mimic these efforts is an affront to the families who lost loved ones on that fateful day in September. John Kerry is not serious about fighting and winning the war against terror. He is not a serious candidate for President of the United States. crushkerry.com