SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sylvester80 who wrote (38787)3/5/2004 8:11:09 AM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Those fanatical four left-wing senators -- kennedy, leahy, schumer, and durbin -- are desperately trying to deflect attention from the dem conspiracy to block Constitutionally - required consideration by the entire Senate of Bush's judicial nominees.

The dems have not even allowed the Senate to give "advice and consent" as required by the Constitution.

Instead, they filibuster and keep the nominations tied up.



To: sylvester80 who wrote (38787)3/5/2004 9:26:29 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 89467
 
Memo Report Inconclusive on Criminal Activity

Friday, March 05, 2004

WASHINGTON — A fact-finding report by the Senate sergeant-at-arms draws no conclusions about whether two Republican staffers committed any crimes when they read files by Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee about their strategy for handling President Bush's judicial nominees.



The report, released Thursday, said security on the committee's computer system was "insufficient," easily allowing two Republican aides to access a shared computer server from which they took 4,670 documents in a compressed zip file. Some of those documents later ended up in the hands of reporters with The Washington Times and Wall Street Journal.

The 60-page plus report by Sergeant-at-Arms William Pickle (search) does not name the two aides and the report, released by the committee chairman and ranking Democrat with blacked-out portions, does not assert that the memos were stolen.

Committee leaders decided to release the report because they wanted "to give out as much information as possible, but we don't want to hamstring a possible prosecution," said ranking member Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

The report does list several criminal statutes that may or may not have been violated. It also discloses that some committee members asked about the possibility of pursuing a "false statement case" against Manuel Miranda (search), a former committee lawyer and aide to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who admitted reading the memos but insisted it did not require any hacking nor was it unethical.

The members seeking a false statement case accused Miranda of being "untruthful with investigators."

Leahy left little doubt what action he will urge during an executive session next week in which the committee will decide whether to refer the matter to the Department of Justice for a criminal investigation.

"I feel it is not difficult to conclude that this was criminal behavior. And the Senate investigation has established the basic facts. First, we have to achieve accountability for the wrongdoing, but more remains to be done about how these stolen files were taken, and how they were used," Leahy said.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said the investigation was incomplete, and said he would support an inquiry by the DOJ.

"It is my view and the view of a few others, that the only way to get to the bottom of this is a special counsel with full investigative powers," Schumer said. "If there were people in the executive branch, if there were people in outside groups involved, Pickle had no way to go talk to them."

Democrats said they are curious to learn whether the White House or the Justice Department got copies of the memos and used them to coach Bush's nominees for confirmation hearings.

In his investigation, Pickle seized committee hard drives, questioned dozens of Hill staffers and traced the dissemination of the memos.

In an exclusive interview with Fox News after the release of the report, Miranda said he's confident prosecutors will see the legality of his actions differently than politicians on the committee.

"My password gave me authorization to go anywhere my mouse and click would take me, and that has to be understood by people, and is understood by most people that are watching now," he said.

Senate Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, declined to repeat earlier assertions that Republican staffers "stole" the memos. He urged both sides to look past the affair and get back to evaluating the president's judicial nominees.

Hatch added that the "memogate affair" deepened divisions among committee members who weigh whether to recommend Senate confirmation of Bush's nominees.

Senate Democrats have been holding up many of Bush's nominees since Sens. Richard Durbin of Illinois and Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts first declared that memos had been stolen. Senators said last month the computer intrusion began as far back as 2001.

Conservatives say the memos are proof the Democrats colluded with liberal groups concerning which Bush nominees to block, and at least one ethics complaint has been filed against Durbin and Kennedy based on the leaked information.

With the report completed, the committee sent to the full Senate the nominations of Raymond W. Gruender for 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and Franklin S. Van Antwerpen for the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Gruender, if confirmed, would work on the St. Louis-based court that encompasses Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa and Arkansas. Van Antwerpen, if confirmed, would work on the Philadelphia-based court overseeing Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the Virgin Islands.

The "memogate" matter could go to any number of entities, including a state bar association, the Senate Ethics Committee or the Department of Justice. Senators also have the option of dropping the matter.

Hatch, who earlier claimed that more than 100 of his computer files were "improperly accessed and transmitted outside the Senate," said it is not a forgone conclusion that the matter will be forwarded to a special prosecutor at the Justice Department.

"The odds are it will," he said.

Fox News' James Rosen and Julie Asher and The Associated Press contributed to this report.



To: sylvester80 who wrote (38787)3/5/2004 11:54:09 AM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
You might find this of interest.

Air Force One phone records subpoenaed

Grand jury to review call logs from Bush’s
jet in probe of how a CIA agent’s cover was blown


BY TOM BRUNE
STAFF WRITER

March 5, 2004

WASHINGTON -- The federal grand jury probing the leak of a covert CIA officer's identity has subpoenaed records of Air Force One telephone calls in the week before the officer's name was published in a column in July, according to documents obtained by Newsday.

Also sought in the wide-ranging document requests contained in three grand jury subpoenas to the Executive Office of President George W. Bush are records created in July by the White House Iraq Group, a little-known internal task force established in August 2002 to create a strategy to publicize the threat posed by Saddam Hussein.

And the subpoenas asked for a transcript of a White House spokesman's press briefing in Nigeria, a list of those attending a birthday reception for a former president, and, casting a much wider net than previously reported, records of White House contacts with more than two dozen journalists and news media outlets.

The three subpoenas were issued to the White House on Jan. 22, three weeks after Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney in Chicago, was appointed special counsel in the probe and during the first wave of appearances by White House staffers before the grand jury.

The investigation seeks to determine if anyone violated federal law that prohibits officials with security clearances from intentionally or knowingly disclosing the identity of an undercover agent.

White House implicated

The subpoenas underscore indications that the initial stages of the investigation have focused largely on the White House staff members most involved in shaping the administration's message on Iraq, and appear to be based in part on specific information already gathered by investigators, attorneys said Thursday.

Fitzgerald's spokesman declined to comment.

The investigation arose in part out of concerns that Bush administration officials had called reporters to circulate the name of the CIA officer, Valerie Plame, in an attempt to discredit the criticism of the administration's Iraq policy by her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV.

In 2002, Wilson went to Niger at the behest of the CIA to check out reports that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium "yellow cake" to develop nuclear weapons. He reported that Iraq sought commercial ties but that businessmen said the Iraqis didn't try to buy uranium.

All three subpoenas were sent to employees of the Executive Office of the President under a Jan. 26 memo by White House counsel Alberto Gonzalez saying production of the documents, which include phone messages, e-mails and handwritten notes, was "mandatory" and setting a Jan. 29 deadline.

"The president has always said we would fully comply with the investigation, and the White House counsel's office has directed the staff to fully comply," White House spokeswoman Erin Healy said Thursday.

The Novak column

Two of the subpoenas focus mainly on White House records, events and contacts in July, both before and after the July 14 column by Robert Novak that said "two senior administration officials" told him Plame was a CIA officer.

The third subpoena repeats an informal Justice Department document request to the White House last fall seeking records about staff contacts with Novak and two Newsday reporters, Knut Royce and Timothy Phelps, who reported on July 22 that Plame was a covert agent and Novak had blown her cover.

The subpoena added journalists such as Mike Allen and Dana Priest of the Washington Post, Michael Duffy of Time magazine, Andrea Mitchell of NBC's "Meet the Press," Chris Matthews of MSNBC's "Hardball," and reporters from The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Associated Press. There have been no reports of journalists being subpoeaned.

The subpoenas required the White House to produce the documents in three stages -- the first on Jan. 30, a second on Feb. 4 and the third on Feb. 6 -- even as White House aides began appearing before the grand jury sitting in Washington, D.C.

The subpoena with the first production deadline sought three sets of documents.

It requested records of telephone calls to and from Air Force One from July 7 to 12, while Bush was visting several nations in Africa. The White House declined Thursday to release a list of those on the trip.

That subpoena also sought a complete transcript of a July 12 press "gaggle," or informal briefing, by then-White House press secretary Ari Fleischer while at the National Hospital in Abuja, Nigeria.

That transcript is missing from the White House Web site containing transcripts of other press briefings. In a transcript the White House released at the time to Federal News Service, Fleischer discusses Wilson and his CIA report.

Finally, the subpoena requested a list of those in attendance at the White House reception on July 16 for former President Gerald Ford's 90th birthday.

The White House at the time announced the reception would honor Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan, but said the event was closed to the press.

The White House Thursday declined to release the list and the Gerald R. Ford Foundation, which paid for the event, did not return phone calls.

The subpoena with the second production deadline sought all documents from July 6 to July 30 of the White House Iraq Group. In August, the Washington Post published the only account of the group's existence.

What about Karl Rove?

It met weekly in the Situation Room, the Post said, and its regular participants included senior political adviser Karl Rove; communication strategists Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin and James R. Wilkinson; legislative liaison Nicholas E. Calio; policy advisers led by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and her deputy Stephen J. Hadley; and I. Lewis Libby, chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Wilson alleged in September that Rove was involved in the leak but a day later pulled back from that, asserting that Rove had "condoned" it.

Hughes left the White House in the summer of 2002. Matalin, who left at the end of 2002, did not return a call for comment. Matalin appeared before the grand jury Jan. 23, the day after the subpoenas were issued.

The subpoena with the last production date repeated the Justice Department's informal request to the White House last fall for documents from Feb. 1, 2002, through 2003 related to Wilson's February 2002 trip to Niger, to Plame and to contacts with journalists.

Current White House press secretary Scott McClellan, press aide Claire Buchan and former press aide Adam Levine have told reporters they appeared before the grand jury Feb. 6. At least five others have reportedly been questioned.

newsday.com

lurqer