Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (184191)	3/5/2004 2:11:52 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576252

re: It is ironic the dems wish to discuss Nam, from 30 yrs ago, and do not wish to discuss Gw's record, especially in the context of 9/11. Certainly they would like to discuss it, in public congressional hearing. But Bush declines... John

To: hmaly who wrote (184191)	3/5/2004 2:24:04 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576252

Yadada, yadada. "Certainly, GW's evasion of his responsibility in the guard would be one such instance, except it was 30 yrs ago," Your missin' the drift here, meaningwise. It's not that he did what any redblooded 'Merican Harvard Grad would have done years ago, it is the implication that he is lying about it today. If it was not important why lie. If he is telling the truth, then the burden on him is to prove it, not bury the facts through the same government process that is handling the facts in Haiti. I am right and you are smart so eventually you will see it my way.