Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (9561)	3/6/2004 10:33:36 AM
From: ChrisJP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

Hi Haim, I more or less agree with you and others on those thoughts. Any anyone who thinks I believe everything the government says is true or does is right should read some of my other posts. There are lots of aspects of this trial worthy of discussion. But one aspect that isn't is her guilt. The other one is that the Dept. of Justice is entitled to bring charges against people who lie to them. Its one thing to be unhappy about the "public circus" nature of this trial and quite another to use those opinions as a basis for asserting she's not guilty of (or rationalizing she shouldn't be put on trial for) what she did. Do I think she should go to the slammer for 20 years out of envy ? Nope. It wouldn't bother me if she got little to no jail time (unless she keeps trying to appeal -- then throw away the key, lol). She could easily make the case that she's suffered enough. Regards, Chris