Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Woodshed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nspolar who wrote (1990)	3/6/2004 3:28:33 PM
From: crustyoldprospector	Respond to of 60929

Mineweb publishes that spreadsheet for the 150 or so largest PM miners a few times every year. Maybe you can find the latest addition there.

To: nspolar who wrote (1990)	3/7/2004 9:18:28 AM
From: chojiro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 60929

KGC has been pissing me off, but then I read this. Have not checked the accuracy and I do not do enough FA to confirm. Interesting none the less. His claims that KGC is "extremely undervauled" compared to CDE because they(KGC) have five times more proven/probable reserves in ground are invalid because he is not taking into consideration the costs in retrieving the metals. Don't quote me on this, and perhaps someone can either correct or substantiate it, but I think CDE's costs for gold are next to nothing and at some of CDEs mines, their cash costs for silver are very low also. So when comparing valuations, we need to consider more factors than just in ground reserves. FTR, I own both stocks but in recent months CDE has become a much larger percentage of my portfolio