SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Martha Stewart -- Scourge or Scapegoat -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John J. O`Reilly who wrote (98)3/7/2004 9:01:19 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 165
 
If your broker tells you insider info be sure and sit there like a dummy and lose money on your stock, ok?

John, as I keep trying to point out, the judge didn't think there was any basis for a claim of insider trading since there was no evidence of manipulation. As a matter of fact, the claim had nothing to do with her actions regarding Imclone stock but of trying to deceive her own investors to manipulate the price of MSO! As it turns out, based on Erbitux now being approved by the FDA, she might one day soon argue she lost money on the trade. Wouldn't that be ironic.

- Jeff



To: John J. O`Reilly who wrote (98)3/7/2004 4:03:58 PM
From: yard_man  Respond to of 165
 
to simply know that Waskal was selling is technically no insider information -- she would have had to know WHY he was selling --