Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (184293)	3/7/2004 1:03:16 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576648

These folks are sincere. They don't want their torture turned into a sleazy political marketing scheme. Would you? Those ads were hardly sleazy. They weren't attack add, as we know it. And 9/11 was too important to ignore. Campaigning for president can be a very sleazy affair. Besides, 9/11 happened to all of us, not just Bush.

To: hmaly who wrote (184293)	3/7/2004 2:59:52 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576648

re: And 9/11 was too important to ignore. For these 117 to claim their right not to see any symbol of 9/11 is more important, than the country's 285 mln people right to discuss it, and giving the country direction, on which way they should proceed is absurd. 9/11 was too big not to be discussed. He's not "discussing" 9/11, he trying to wrap it like a subliminal cloak around his administration. It's marketing crap, and it's disgusting to a lot of people who lost loved ones. Doesn't bother you though. John PS... it will probably back fire, big time.