SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (33284)3/7/2004 12:53:14 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793917
 
The Hunt Heats Up
The man in charge of catching Osama bin Laden 'can drive a knife through your ribs in a nanosecond.' Inside the search

Bertrand Meunier / Agence Vu for Newsweek

By Michael Hirsh and John Barry

Newsweek March 15 issue - Admirers of Bill McRaven like to tell a story of his courage and grit. Not against the enemy, but against the legendarily ruthless Dick Marcinko, a gung-ho Navy SEAL commander in the Vietnam era who used to swallow sacs of cobra venom and boast that "killing is my mission." Marcinko once ordered McRaven, then a young lieutenant on the super-elite SEAL Team Six, to perform "some questionable activities," recounts a former Special Forces commander. McRaven refused and "would not back down." (Marcinko did not return phone calls seeking comment.) "McRaven was a hero among all the junior officers for his stand," says the commander. "It was considered a career-ending move."


Not quite. William H. McRaven, it seems, was too good an officer. Today he is a rear admiral, and his new job is one that could not rank higher on President George W. Bush's to-do list in election year 2004: nailing Osama bin Laden. It is a job that will require much ruthlessness—a good deal more of that, perhaps, than personal honor. NEWSWEEK has learned that McRaven is heading up Task Force 121, a covert, miniature strike force with a command structure so secretive that McRaven's role hasn't even been reported until now.

Task Force 121, which also helped to capture Saddam Hussein under McRaven's command, represents something brand-new in warfare, a pure hybrid of civilian intelligence and military striking power. It is the most ambitious melding yet of CIA assets, Special Forces (mainly the Army's Delta Force) and the Air Force. Formed late last year as part of Joint Special Operations Command—the secret "black ops" under Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who until recently was deputy operations director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff—it is designed to produce a lightning-fast reaction should intel locate bin Laden or any other "high-value targets" anywhere for a few hours. It's a work in progress: CIA Director George Tenet meets frequently with Gen. John Abizaid, the head of Central Command, to nurture the marriage.

McRaven has managed to bridge both the civilian and military worlds. While working at the National Security Council after 9/11, he was principal author of the White House strategy for combating terrorism. McRaven also literally wrote the book on Special Ops, a 1995 history of surgical strike teams from the Nazi rescue of Mussolini in 1943 to the 1976 Israeli raid on Entebbe. And his thesis at naval postgrad school is now mandatory reading for Special Ops commanders. "Bill is reputed to be the smartest SEAL that ever lived," says a former commander who knows McRaven well. "He is physically tough, compassionate and can drive a knife through your ribs in a nanosecond." According to his former boss at the White House, Gen. Wayne Downing, "if anybody is smart and cunning enough to get [bin Laden], McRaven and the Delta and SEAL Team Six guys he now commands will do it."

INTERACTIVE

• Global Dragnet
Key figures and developments in the hunt for al-Qaida


Is anybody good enough? The hunt for bin Laden is an unprecedented confrontation between 21st-century technology and age-old guerrilla tactics. While the elusive terror chieftain hides in mountain caves and scurries along mule trails, Task Force 121 "bytes" away at him and his chief deputy, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, with the best the Information Age has to offer. Using powerful software called Analyst's Notebook, which helps to piece together data on criminal and terror networks—Special Forces command just ordered up more copies—military and intelligence officials are increasingly confident they are narrowing bin Laden's whereabouts.

It's a classic cat-and-mouse game in which tactics abruptly shift on both sides. In years past, U.S. officials listened in on bin Laden's cell-phone conversations. But he apparently no longer dares to use electronic means of communication. So McRaven and his hunters are now trying to snare his couriers in transit. They scored a major victory two months ago with the capture of Hassan Ghul, a Qaeda operative who was carrying what U.S. officials say was a strategic memo from Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, the mysterious terror leader allegedly behind the bombings of Shiites in Iraq. Ghul also yielded intel on bin Laden's position. Key to the search is "accumulated humint," or human intelligence, says one insider. Other officials tell NEWSWEEK that an increasing number of "data points"—reports of sightings—have created an ever-clearer picture of bin Laden's area of operation as he appears to shuttle between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Now they've focused that picture to the point where they have been able to send in Predator unmanned aerial vehicles to search for him.

If the hunters are getting closer to their prey, it's also thanks to a renewed effort by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to infiltrate the border regions sympathetic to Al Qaeda. On Saturday, the BBC reported that bin Laden narrowly escaped one such Pakistani raid, and NEWSWEEK confirmed that such an incident occurred. Within the past few weeks, some intelligence sources say, a U.S. Predator also spotted a suspect believed to be Al-Zawahiri somewhere in the border area.

NEWSWEEK ON AIR | 3/07/04
Terror: Al-Qaeda Inside and Out
Michael Hirsh, NEWSWEEK Senior Editor/Washington, and Richard Pollak, Author of The Colombo Bay

• Listen to the audio
• Listen to the complete On Air show


Some Afghan and Pakistani sources, however, insist that bin Laden is several steps ahead—and that he will continue to outsmart his pursuers. A Taliban official in Pakistan, contacted by NEWSWEEK, says he's heard that both top Qaeda leaders moved to more secure and separate locations in January, before the spate of publicity about an American "spring offensive." The Taliban official learned that, he said, from a ranking Qaeda operative, a Yemeni who told him that other Qaeda and Taliban fighters had moved into Afghan provinces more than 100 miles from the Pakistani border. "We decided to leave the dangerous zone for safer areas," the Arab told the Taliban official, who goes by the nom de guerre Zabihullah. "The sheik is now in the most secure area he has ever been in," the Arab said, referring to bin Laden. "We were all laughing at all these recent reports that the Americans had our sheik cornered."

Zabihullah also said he received an encrypted e-mail last Thursday from a senior Qaeda source in Saudi Arabia. The Qaeda operative told him not to be taken in by the American "psychological warfare" campaign about bin Laden's imminent capture. He assured Zabihullah in the e-mail that "the sheik is in a safer place than ever and is more healthy than he's ever been."

McRaven could be using psyop to flush bin Laden and others out of their hiding places. But the real key to success, the Task Force 121 commander knows, may be the "hammer and anvil" of converging U.S. Special Forces teams in Afghanistan and some 70,000 Pakistani forces in the border areas. In one recent operation in Waziristan, Pakistani security forces arrested several women married to foreign fighters, hoping for a lead on bin Laden. Similarly, they have destroyed the houses of tribesmen suspected of sheltering Qaeda fugitives. Pakistani officials said the tactic has worked, providing valuable information while apparently helping to drive Qaeda and Taliban fighters back across the Afghan border—into the hands, they hope, of Task Force 121. The standing U.S. offer of $25 million for bin Laden's head provides an extra incentive. "We now have all the ingredients in place for more effective operations in the days to come," says a senior Pakistani official. The man who's been tasked with blending those ingredients together, Bill McRaven, is betting on it.



To: LindyBill who wrote (33284)3/7/2004 3:33:06 PM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 793917
 
The New Iraq for real

I'm no fan of Geraldo, but I think he's got it right for once.

The Buildings that aren't Burning in Iraq

The buildings that AREN'T burning in Iraq.... Probably each of you has
wondered if things could be as bad as Brokaw, Jennings, et al, have been
painting it.

"They have a saying in the news business," Geraldo Rivera related this
week. "Reporters don't report buildings that don't burn." And with that
introduction, he told a TV audience about the story that is being
systematically denied to our entire nation: the success story of
post-Saddam Iraq.
Are we losing some soldiers each week? Yes.
Is there some frustration in the public about electricity and water
service? Yes.
Are some Saddam Hussein loyalists throughout the land, making trouble?
Yes.
Has this opened a window for some terrorist mischief? Yes.
But that's ALL we hear. No wonder the country is in a mixed mood about
Iraq. If you hear about the buildings that are not burning, though, it
is a different story indeed.

Rivera is no shill for George W. Bush. But Bush, Condi Rice and Colin
Powell together could not have been as effective as Geraldo was Thursday
night on the Fox News Channel's Hannity and Colmes program.

"When I got to Baghdad, I barely recognized it," he began, comparing
his just-completed trip to two others he made during and just after the
battle to topple Saddam. "You have over 30,000 Iraqi cops and
militiamen already on the job.

This is four months after major fighting stopped. Can you imagine that
kind of gearing up in this country? Law and order is better;
archaeological sites are being preserved; factories, schools are being
guarded." But what about the secondhand griping that the media have
been so efficiently relating about power, water and other
infrastructure?

"To say that Iraq is being rebuilt is not true," answered Rivera.
"Iraq is being built. There was no infrastructure before; we are doing
it. I just think the good news is being underestimated and
underreported." At this juncture, one must evaluate how to feel about
the voices telling us only about the bad news in Iraq, whether from the
mouths of news anchors or Democratic presidential hopefuls. At best,
they are under informed. At worst, their one-sided assessments of post-
Saddam Iraq are intentional falsehoods for obvious reasons.

If I hear one more person mock that "Mission Accomplished" banner
beneath which President Bush thanked a shipload of sailors and Marines a
few months back, I'm going to spit. That was a reference to the ouster
of Saddam's regime, and that mission was indeed accomplished, apparently
to the great chagrin of the American left. No one said what followed
would be easy or cheap, and that's why the dripping-water torture of the
cost and casualty stories is so infuriating.

Remember we pay our soldiers whether they are in Iraq or in Ft Bragg,
North Carolina or Ft Hood, Texas or where ever.
We should all mourn the loss of every fallen soldier. But context
cries out to be heard. Our present news media is not performing this
task. As some dare to wonder if this might become a Vietnam-like
quagmire, I'll remind whoever needs it that most of our 58,000 Vietnam
War toll died between 1966 and 1972, during which we lost an average of
about 8,000 per year. That's about 22 per day, every day, for thousands
of days on end.
Let us hear NO MORE Vietnam comparisons. They do not equate. What I
hope to hear is more truth, even if we have to wrench it from the mouths
of the media and political hacks predisposed to bash the remarkable job
we are doing every day in what was not so long ago a totalitarian
wasteland. Local elections are under way across Iraq, Rivera reported.
"Where Kurds and Arabs have been battling for decades, things have been
settling down. Administrator Paul Bremer is doing a great job."

So does Geraldo think his media colleagues are intentionally painting
with one side of the brush? "I'm not into conspiracy theories... but
there's just more bang for your buck when you report the GI who got
killed rather than the 99 who didn't get killed, who make friends, who
helped schedule elections, who helped shops get open for business, who
helped traffic flow again.

"The vast majority of Iraqis are very happy to have us there. I would
like to see a bit more balance." This needs to be reported to the
American Public who are presently being duped. I expect the dominant
media culture to nitpick and attack Bush, and Democrats to blast him
with reckless abandon. But when that leads to the willful exclusion of
facts that would shine truthful light on the great work of the American
armed forces, that level of malice plumbs new depths. If you have a
friend that is looking for the truth, pass this on.