Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (4749)	3/8/2004 1:09:46 AM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Once again, you didn't seem to understand the question. I asked, "what has Kerry ever done in his career to become an expert on counter-terrorism?" Nevertheless, I may just read the book. But I may come to the same conclusion this reviewer did from CBS News.... "Kerry must be assuming no one will go back and actually read his manifesto, because his description of it is awfully selective. Yes, Kerry briefly considered the possibility of a terrorist catastrophe on American soil. But The New War was almost entirely focused on the threat of global crime -- not terrorism. If the future Kerry predicted really had arrived, we'd currently be locked in a vicious cyberwar with CD-pirating Japanese yakuza, Chinese kidney-traders, and Italian mobsters -- not hunting Islamic fundamentalists potentially armed with weapons of mass destruction. It is, of course, true that almost no one predicted a September 11-like attack, and few correctly identified Islamic terrorists as the chief post-cold-war security threat to the United States. But the ways in which The New War missed the mark are nevertheless revealing. They show the extent to which Kerry was influenced by the criminal investigations of his early Senate career, his preference for viewing post-cold-war security more as a matter for law enforcement than the military, and his tendency to describe problems ad nauseam without offering a clear and bold course of action." cbsnews.com

To: American Spirit who wrote (4749)	3/8/2004 6:33:21 AM
From: Selectric II	Respond to of 90947

If terrorism is Kerry's forte, he's a miserable failure. You should be hiding the fact, not marketing it. Why didn't Kerry get Clinton's ear all those eight years while al Qaeda grew and planned, unfettered? Why didn't Kerry do something to expose and avoid 9/11? You make him sound like the one guy who could have done something. But he failed. Now the cows are out of the barn, and Bush has had to take much stronger action.